Monday, December 13, 2010
Timothy Ely at the MAC
While I would highly advise going to this exhibit there were a number of things that bothered me about the concepts within the art. From what I gathered by going to the museum, and reading the wall texts and the provided literature I got the impression that each book has a theme that it focuses on. However, without being able to flip through the books, or have pictures of each of the pages, or additional texts on each of the individual books the viewer is unable to see how this done within the books or what the themes of any of the books were.
Friday, December 3, 2010
Matt Boland at the Kolva Sullivan Gallery
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Mark Pauline at the MAC
On Wednesday November 17 Dillon and I had the opportunity to go downtown to the Museum of Arts and Culture to listen to a lecture series given by the director of Survival Research Laboratories, Mark Pauline. Mark spent his late teen in the work force learning the difficult labor-intensive way that many Americans make a living. After just a few short years he decided he needed to go to college and after graduating college he began SRL in 1978 in San Francisco.
After his short experience in the defense engineering industry, Mark got tired of making things to hurt people and wanted to extract the hidden entertainment from these robotic machines. He felt as though everyone lives with a certain level of fear about the technologies that surround them, so he created SRL to extract the innate fear of technologies from his audience.
SRL’s focus is to create an orchestra of machines that terrify us while at the same time make socio-political, satirical commentary. A typical show put on by SRL spans anywhere between 15 and 45 minutes long and has a budget between $10,000 to $400,000. Mark personally determines the show size by tonnage of the combined robots, which can range anywhere from 10 to 100 tons of equipment. Many of the shows include elements that intentionally overload your senses, for example in many shows he has screeching, smaller jet engines, grinding, banging and my personal favorite the v1 buzz bomber, loud enough to be heard from 21 miles away.
The artist lecture, opened the public's eyes to a new kind of art, an art that attempts to be "the most original kind of art"-- art that is so complicated that it has never been done before, and shows that require so much time that it will never be done again. We feel that we are connected to this type of work because we feel that any artist's main goal is to be "the most original". Mark stated how his work was so far disconnected from reality, that he needed no explanation behind his intentions, other than "that's just the way things are". What determines if a work is original? Is there a point in time that no matter what one does, it was already done before, and we're just trying to make it better? Does a work have to be original to be good, or is the minimum alteration of “10%” going to become standard?
Roger Feldman at the Brian Oliver
Roger Feldman is no stranger to the Northwest. As a young man he received his BA in art from the University of Washington. He also received an MFA in sculpture from Claremont Graduate University, and then went on to study seminary as well. At this time in his life Roger is a professor at Seattle Pacific University and continues to create works of interest for many people. Mr. Feldman is well traveled, he has works in the United States, Austria, Indonesia and England. His works can also be seen on University campuses such as George Fox University. All of Roger's works have a theological air. His creations symbolize the Holy Spirit, repentance and the tree of life, among other things.
The Brian Oliver Gallery at Whitworth University was honored to host Roger Feldman on Tuesday, November 16th, 2010 from 5:00-7:30. His collection of pieces is one of a kind. He used elements of water, desert, clouds, wind and rain to illustrate a theological basis. These were the reoccurring themes. He used renewable materials such as bamboo to bring another aspect into play. By bringing this exhibit to Whitworth he was able to connect with others who have similar theological views, to bring them a new perspective of the meaning of art. I believe that his intent was to show Christ in every part of his artwork. We may have to look very deeply to see the meaning, but it is always there. Christ is always in the background, and at the center of Roger's metaphors. At the beginning of the exhibit was a pallet hanging from a bridge, it was stacked full of old, broken objects. The counterweight was purified water. When talking with Roger he explained to me that this part of the work symbolized purity countering brokenness, with Christ being the bridge. The pallet of broken things represented the world that was broken but was bridged by Christ's purity. As I walked through the rest of the exhibit I found references to water, desert, and renewable materials. The wall of clouds in the exhibit represents the process of water evaporating from the oceans or rivers and being transported by clouds. When you were in the exhibit you could hear running water and rain, yet another link to the resources of the earth. Another part of the work was a wall of water directly behind the wall of clouds and next to it was a wall representing desert. In this work you could easily see the elements of the earth working together. I asked Roger what his favorite part of the work was, and he said that it was the sail that was being used as a projector screen. He said that it was important to him because it represented the Holy Spirit which plays a huge role in his life. These simple yet profound shapes have the ability to affect many. People can visually see what Christ is doing for us. They can also visually see the cycles of the earth, and the harmony that it creates.
Roger Feldman's works are different from other artists, for instance an artist who paints, such of Van Go can only bring out one sense, the sense of sight. Roger creates pieces that can be experienced by sight, sound, and touch. In these works you can actually experience the pieces. The viewer can walk through it, look at it, hear it, and make many other conclusions from their sensory experience.
At first I felt very disconnected from the work because I failed to find any deeper meaning in the piece. At the beginning all I saw was a pallet packed with junk, but after talking to Roger I found the deeper meaning. Initially I was drawn to the wall of clouds due to its aesthetic value. As the conversation with Roger drew on I began to find the deeper, metaphorical meaning behind the work. I then began to make connections with the work, by thinking about Christ in my own life and the analogies that Roger created. I found myself drawn to the metaphor of the world's brokenness and Christ purity bridging the gap. I then understood that Roger was creating a tangible explanation of Christ and what He does for us. In my opinion Roger's creations are unique and extremely creative. He is able to come up with profound concepts backed by deeper meaning. He creates pieces to invoke thoughts, but not necessarily only his own thoughts. He expresses theological ideas but makes the works so that all people can get something out of the work even if they are not religiously inclined.
Given the metaphors and analogies in Roger's work, do you think that many people grasp his true intended meaning behind the piece?
Back to Nature (with community arts)...
Painting the Woodland Caribou |
In tandem with the book, the students created a sculpture of their animal and the Scouts painted them. An exhibition and coloring book sale (proceeds go to wildlife preservation) is forthcoming – we’ll post the date and location once it is confirmed.
Sample Coloring psge |
Nice work! |
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
Photographers at the Chase
Artist sits and talks with guest |
Art goers exchange a few words |
How important is it to unify an entire art show, and does an un-unified art show affect the environment of the show for the viewers?
Monday, November 15, 2010
The Reluctant Muse...at the Tinman
"Cupra Alta" |
Woman appreciates Wilson's paintings |
Musicians set the mood for Friday art walk at the Tinman |
"Green Sky Storm from the Hotel Oassi" |
Art goers enjoying the light atmosphere at the Tinman |
Thursday, October 28, 2010
Chris Jordan at Whitworth University
I attended Chris Jordan’s presentation on Tuesday, October 12. Since I interviewed Chris before the presentation, I expected a longer version of what he talked about during the interview. His presentation contained many of the same eye-opening material that he mentioned in his interview, but he emphasized more on his projects than his biography. Chris Jordan began his talk by saying “There is nothing special about me.” This surprised me because I have seen his work and I do believe it is special. However, he insisted that he is not special, but just loves what he does, and it shows. It is obvious that Chris Jordan is very passionate about his work. His mission is to open the public’s eyes to different issues facing us as humans and our planet. First, Jordan spoke briefly about his upbringing and how he got to where he is today. Detachment was a key concept in his upbringing; whether it was detachment with the world around him or the detachment of him with himself. Then, he spoke about his project known as “Running the Numbers.” This lasted most of the presentation, for good reason. Lastly, Jordan spoke about his newest project known as the Midway Island project. He is planning on returning to Midway to take more pictures of the effects of the Pacific Gyre (an enormous gathering of plastic in the middle of the Pacific Ocean). The Pacific Gyre is killing most of the albatross that live on Midway Island, and not too many people know about this. Jordan is trying to get people involved and let them know about this present tragedy. Furthermore, Jordan is planning on bringing students and a film crew with him in the spring. This way, he can show people the beauty and cuteness of the albatross that live on this island. (More can be learned at Midwayjourney.com)
Jordan’s most well-known work comes from his “Running the Numbers” project. This project is all about the idea of mass consumption and human tendencies. For example, one of Jordan’s pieces depicts 38,000 shipping containers, the number of containers processed through American ports every twelve hours. Many of the artwork in his “Running the Numbers” project is made in Photoshop. He takes a picture of certain objects in different positions, then he stitches those images together however many times he must in order to accurately show a certain statistic. This transcale imagery gives people a visual depiction to relate to the number statistics people hear. Jordan described his work as being able to put huge statistics in perspective in a way that people can understand.
As opposed to such artists like Robert Glenn Ketchum, Chris Jordan shows people the ugly side of what we are doing to the planet, and evokes change. Ketchum’s works show us the beauty of the world and makes one want to keep it that way. Both artists evoke change in community and society. However, they both choose different ways to evoke such change.
I was able to really connect with Jordan’s message about the tigers and how their depletion is increasing at an incredibly rapid rate. This piece shows what seems to be an orange frame with a black background. It depicts 3200 toy tigers, equal to the estimated number of tigers remaining on Earth. The space in the middle would hold 40,000 of these tigers, equal to the global tiger population in 1970. Personally, I would like to see this frame begin to refill. However, how could one person make such a significant difference?
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Harold Balazs at the Tinman
Monday, October 11, 2010
Underpinnings
Who: Amanda Knowles
She received her undergraduate degree from the University of Pennsylvania in printmaking and her masters in printmaking from the University of Wisconsin. Currently, she is a lecturer in printmaking and drawing at North Seattle Community College.
What: “Underpinnings” Amanda Knowles Art Exhibit/Art lecture
When: September 14, 2010
Where: Bryan Oliver Gallery at Whitworth University –
In keeping with Whitworth's mission, the art department strives to develop in its students an awareness and appreciation of God's world. Professionally active faculty members whose works have won awards at exhibits and juried competitions throughout the nation encourage students to participate in art to enhance their life experiences, to develop skills and concepts through theory and practice, and to immerse themselves intellectually and spiritually.
Why: This event follows Whitworth University Art Department’s mission to encourage students to participate in art and enhance their life experiences.
Amanda Knowles primarily does prints, but she also mixes in a little mixed media and sculpture. Her work has a common theme of scientific figures/shapes, and she incorporates them in different ways throughout her pieces. Knowles started using these shapes due to the influence of her parents. Both of them are scientists, and she grew up looking at the vast amount of scientific figures/designs in their textbooks. Her intent with her images is to take the scientific figures/shapes out of their normal context and reassemble them in interesting ways; this allows for a sense of imagery and allows the viewer to make their own interpretations of the figures/shapes.
For instance, her Pitch series does exactly this. These three pieces shown in her show, Underpinnings, are mixed media on paper. With these she incorporated photography and print. In the background of each of these pieces there is a photo she took of the silhouette of a ferries wheel. Then on top of the silhouettes, she layers her scientific figure/shape that look like a metal donut, similar in shape to the ferries wheel. The pieces are attractive because of the way she juxtaposed the photo with the different layers of the donut shape, printed and/or drawn on. Unfortunately, when she talked about these pieces in her lecture she never really had a specific meaning behind them, only that she thought they looked cool. She prefers to let the viewer come up with their own context.
By showing at Whitworth University’s Bryan Oliver gallery, it allows the northern Spokane community to view her masterful printmaking abilities. The Bryan Oliver gallery has not shown printmakers from outside the Spokane community in the recent years, thus this is a refreshing change. Whitworth’s art department does offer courses in printmaking, and now the students can see an accomplished printmaker, other than their own professor Scott Kolbo. We have seen many of Kolbo’s pieces over the years, but unlike Kolbo, Knowles doesn’t use the human figure in her pieces. Her main subject matter is her unique designs of a specific scientific figure/shape, whereas, Kolbo’s work often tells a story of a person. Also, Kolbo mainly sticks to the gray scale, but Knowles enjoys experimenting with different color palettes in each of her pieces.
Overall I enjoyed her show, but I did wish to hear about a little more meaning behind her images when she gave her art lecture. I was disappointed when I found that she doesn’t really have any specific meanings behind her images, only that she finds scientific figures/shapes and reassembles them so the viewer could make their own interpretations. In fact, all her lecture consisted of was her expressing her fascination with the images she had created, often pausing just to gasp at her own work. Even though, her work is really pleasant to look at, especially because of the way she assembled all the scientific figures/shapes shapes, which she described as “wonkey.” But it does make me wonder if her work might be more significant if she actually researched what the figures/shapes meant and purposely composed her images around their purposes…
Saturday, October 9, 2010
This Month at the Saranac
Last Saturday, I attended the art exhibit at the Saranac in downtown Spokane. I went with the intention of seeing some of Scott Kolbo- one of my art Professor's- works, but got even more out of the event than I expected.
Scott Kolbo and Jen Erickson both had new works on display, which will be available for viewing for the rest of October (so go take a look!). Scott Kolbo's drawings and prints consist of hand drawn elements mixed with photomechanical prints. The characters he uses are normally thrown into some type of humorous and grotesque environment.
Jen Erickson's drawings consist of mini graphite mark-making that reflect her fascination of scientific examinations and other visual systems. From far away, her art looks like one big shape or mass, but when you are within inches of it you can see that it is made up of hundreds of miniscule objects like zeroes.
The work of Kolbo's that I was most interested in was the Monroe Street Dog Attack. The piece is an archival ink jet print; ink, acrylic, prismacolor, and charcoal on paper were used. The print shows a scene of a grungy man being attacked in the middle of a Spokane street by two vicious dogs. Off to the right there are flames exploding and smoke bollowing from two cars that have just collided. Overall, the theme isn't a very happy one, but like Kolbo usually does, it shows a scene from society that most people would not choose to recognize and represent publicly. I personally found the piece very interesting and had a hard time not staring at it for the majority of the time I was in the Saranac.
Earlier I mentioned that this event was more than a display of works by two incredibly talented artists. This is because I got a lot of information from the discussion panel of four artists who spoke at the event. There were many questions raised about our art community today, about Spokane's participation in the arts, the changing media, the role of education, how we find critical dialogue, and other important topics. The panel agreed that they would like to see more media coverage visually, and also more critical, essential coverage. Since there is a disconnect in the generations of artists, the artists agreed that art education shouldn't stop at the learning process and technique, but that as many venues should be opened as possible. Artists also find it hard to find good critical dialogue because people are too afraid of criticism and rejection of their art. So my question to the community is: where do YOU think the areas of art could be improved today? Is it in our youth, in media coverage, critical dialogue, or some other form of participation?
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Because of the variations in the artists, there were many themes, ideas, materials, and more. As a whole this event was a success. It was geared entirely towards the community, their involvement, and emerging artist participation. It left viewers and those that attended wanting more. There was a great showing and was very busy. Compared to other artists and gallery spaces this was unconventional in the best way. The whole show seemed to feel more authentic than that of other distant galleries.
What was excellent to see, was that there were not tight rules. It was not limited to formally trained individuals. There was room to experiment with the work itself. Some had innocence and others we very distinguished in the craft. Seeing all of these pieces together in this setting was a positive experience. There was live local music which added to the casual, and urban feel of this Spokane show.
Some questions to ponder include:
Video by: Kellen Pacheco and Casey Armstrong
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
New Works at The Saranac
Saranac Art Projects is a non-profit artists’ cooperative that is geared towards involving the community and other artists in a contemporary art culture. Kolbo and Erickson are members of this artist co-op and have chosen to share their artwork with the community and other practicing artists. This event and organization allows for the community to come and enjoy the work of local artists in a wonderful environment put on by the members of the non-profit artists’ co-op.
Scott Kolbo, an art Professor at Whitworth University, mainly works in printmaking, but also utilizes his skills in drawing, digital projections, and installations. All of Kolbo's works are inspired by the daily humors that he observes in the world around us; the tendencies that we fail to recognize as members of society. Kolbo steps back, observes these hilarious events, and then creates a comical story weaving reality with grotesque characters and boisterous events.
In his New Works, Kolbo’s series of prints and drawings are focused around a comical series of characters that he has created, and uses these characters to create his satires. Each character has its own unique background which is critical to interpreting each of his works. The staging of the events taking place in each piece is seemingly located in Spokane’s west-central neighborhoods. In studying and understanding his own environment, Kolbo treats the setting of each of his works to be a microcosm to the rest of the world.
Then we have Jen Erickson, who’s latest works have been inspired by the idea of loss and decay. Each of Erickson’s works goes through a seemingly similar process of having a painted surface, followed by symbols of decay drawn repetitively throughout each piece. What is interesting about her work though is that she makes you take a few steps closer to the piece; getting up close and personal in a sense. The size of each symbol are purposefully drawn small so to create an overall aesthetic appearance when looked at from afar—similar to the same idea schools of small fish use as a defense tactic. When observed at a distance, each symbol blends together to create one large object, but realistically it is only one small symbol drawn closely to the next. The symbols in each piece of work are systematically placed to create a decaying feel of the overall artwork.
I found that Erickson’s work reminded me of Amanda Knowles, in a sense that these two artists seem to work more formally than contextually. When observing Erickson’s and Knowle’s artworks, I felt as though I only wanted to see the formal quality of each piece, which I personally enjoy. There may very well be a contextual meaning behind their works, but I never found myself digging to find what it was. And, I think that is why some viewers are drawn to a formal piece, and why others may be turned away. I feel that some people may want more juice behind each piece than what is actually intended by the artist, and I’m not saying that’s a bad thing. I mean art is meant to be interpreted by the viewer, right? An artist can only give the viewer so much before he begins to spoon food his/her message to the audience, but what if the viewer begins to add context to something that has no context? Or, the viewer doesn’t understand the context because it is so complex and can’t interpret the work?
Learn more about Saranac Art Projects by clicking here.
Photos by: Kellen Pacheco
Amplified Growth, at the Second Space Gallery
The Second Space Gallery is currently showing a series of mixed media paintings by Jessica LaPrade. The show is well named “Amplified Growth.” All of her works are teaming with energy, and patterns that seem to grow off of the canvas. The images of bees and flowers, and the bright colors and repeating square and hexagonal patterns all give a sense of the repetition and renewal of life. According to LaParade this series “reinterprets the natural world, by integrating technological and urban, contrivances into textural studies of nature.”
LaPrade’s largest piece in the exhibit, “The Last Colony” was a triptych. It has hexagons of various blues, greens, yellows and browns creating a pattern continuing throughout the patting. In Large gaps left by the painting you can see a royal blue sky and in the middle panel on the right side a bright yellow hive that takes up almost a third of the middle canvas. The tree that the hive hangs from is right of the hive, but its long branches continue onto all three of the canvases. The texture of the work defines the hexagonal spaces and the hive. The drippy paint and Impressionistic style mix communicated an energy as well as an uneasiness to me as the viewer. It was though I was looking at a real hive, it is amazing to see but there was also something about it that made me uneasy. I liked her work, even if this piece made me uneasy, because it all got a reaction out of me.
LaPrade grew up in Virginia, but came to Washington to get her degree from Eastern Washington University. She graduated with her bachelors of art in 2008. I know that I certainly like seeing a locally taught artist doing well in the community. Normally when I think of local artist I think of older ladies and gentlemen painting quintessential scenes of local historical landmarks. I like seeing local artist that are creating works that reflect contemporary art ideals and have some deeply conceptual ideas. I think that the community also enjoys seeing art like this and I think that it is good to how this art because it helps teach the community about what contemporary art is doing as well as draws them into see work by someone in there community.
Do you also think that seeing local artist with a working knowledge of contemporary art is more beneficial for the community?